Sunday, October 14, 2018

Innovation 101: What does it mean to innovate in FMCG

Its been a while since I wrote & apologies for that. Clearly I couldn’t keep up the discipline of writing at least once every month (much like my diet). 

What prompted me to write today was actually the Maven Meet - IIM Indore - Mumbai campus’s marketing event. It was a one day event with 8 speakers including me and the theme of the event was Disrupt or Die. Each one of us had picked up a trending topic within innovation to show how innovation is the only step forward. The event made me realise I haven’t covered Innovation at all on this platform so far. So here we go - Innovation 101!!!

During the course of this post; I will try and cover two fundamental things about Innovation:

1. Renovation vs Innovation
2. When to Innovate

Before I start, putting out a caveat - these are my experiences & views about innovation and may not be 100% relevant for all categories and companies. So be like goblin forged metal - imbibe only what makes you stronger (apologies to the non Harry Potter fans reading this). 

My entire post has an underlying assumption - the company/brand is conscious about ROI & success. There are outlier brands/companies - those who must not be named. They are the dark forces who only innovate to make life difficult for competition without caring about ROI now or anytime in foreseeable future. So I am not going to look at such outliers. 

Renovation vs Innovation

Simply put anything you do which is new on the base business is called renovation and when you introduce a new variant/sub brand/benefit et al its call an innovation. But its not so simple and hence lets try & understand the objective of each. 

Renovation is something that makes your current promise or as I call it the current core benefit either more relevant to your non buyers to increase trial or induces brand loyalty that results in either higher frequency of purchase or higher consumption (or both) amongst your current users. 

I am consciously making a bold & a controversial statement. Most marketers will tell you any initiative should do both but I truly think that its “mithya” and hence does not exist. Lets see why I believe in this so strongly. 

When you renovate you can take one of the following actions:

a) Make your product better 
b) Change something that is not liked in your product (cited as a reason for lapsage)
c) Make better claims on your product because of either a product improvement or new testing or some new technology that allows you to make new claims without changing the product substantially 
d) Change benefit or add benefits to your promise

Now think about it - while some of these actions can appeal more to both your users & non users - your analysis & consequent actions need to come from pushing one trigger. 

Lets use an example here. Suppose there is brand of child nutrition that promises immunity as a benefit (completely fictional & I dont know if any brand does). The non users may not be buying it today because of the following three reasons (in no particular order): 
1. They dont trust/like the brand
2. They like their current brand & dont think they need to switch 
3. They dont buy into immunity as a benefit - whatever may be their reason

And similarly the users of the brand buy it because:
1. Immunity is important to them 
2. They trust/like the brand
3. Their child eats it without any fuss etc. 

Now lets go back to the 5 levers one can pull for renovation: 

a) Improving your product say its flavour- this can only make your current buyers appreciate your product & use it more often. A non buyer has rejected immunity/brand & not the product because she hasn’t even tried it. Also someone who has lapsed will rarely come back to you on a promise of a better product. Product improvement can reduce future lapsage. 
b) Change something that is not liked in the product say its ability to mix with water without forming lumps - this will make current users to buy you more often. A non user will not start feeding her child immunity boosting nutrition just because its now easy to mix.
c) Make better claims on your product - your current buyers buy you because they like you, believe your promise & are happy with it. They will not start feeding their child more because you have 2 times better immunity booster. But for non users this could be a reason to start buying you. If they had credibility issues with immunity claim maybe this convinces them to try you 
d) Change/add benefits - say the brand says immunity + brain development. In my opinion it will attract new users more than increasing consumption amongst current users because mental development will bring in new users. In fact, changing or altering promise on a large base business needs to be done with extreme caution because you need to be sure that your current consumers are not rejecting you because of whatever change you are doing. 

Hence all testing for renovation has to have one of the two KPIs. Either win among current users on PI or win among new users on PI while maintaining parity among current users. 

Innovation is something that expands your brand’s consumer base or usage because of a new promise or benefit. An innovation can use one of the following routes:

a) Leverage new benefit segments that are adjacent or complimentary to your core benefit 
b) Leverage different sensorials essentially fragrances, ingredients, flavours etc. 
c) Appeal to a new TG/user group 
d) Leverage a new usage ocassion
e) Ride on a prevalent trend/seasonality/current event that is important in a consumer’s life
f) Create an absolutely never heard before benefit 
g) Makes current consumer habit/usafe easier through convenience

Lets look at an example of each through the lens of the immunity child nutrition brand. 

a) Leverage new benefit segments: the brand could launch a new range/variant for height gain, weight gain, better digestive system or any other benefit relevant to parents with kids in that age group. 
b) Leverage different sensorials essentially fragrances, ingredients, flavours etc. - create exciting flavours like chocolate or use ingredients like almonds
c) Appeal to a new TG/user group - create a separate range/variant for older kids whose need for immunity is different
d) Leverage a new usage ocassion - create a different variant for night consumption or when the kid has just finished some physical activity
e) Ride on a prevalent trend/seasonality/current event that is important in a consumer’s life - Monsoon variant or winter variant because the needs for immunity are different. 
f) Create an absolutely never heard before benefit - Am being creative here but say you had a product that could build immunity from allergies 
g) Makes current consumer habit/usage easier through convenience - ready to drink packs, single use packs hence no need to measure etc

Now coming to some tough ones with no right or wrong answer and depends on the companies philosophy more than anything else but I am going to still slot it where I personally feel it should be slotted.

LUPs - should it be innovation or renovation? One could argue it can be both. For me its renovation because it makes your current benefit more appealing/relevant to non users  - basically breaking affordability barrier. 

New News Changes - stuff like packaging change, form, shape, colour - I personally think it can be both depending on the nature of change. If packaging change makes the product easier to use or more convenient it is an innovation. On the other hand if its just to do something new & get noticed & improve shelf throw its renovation. For e.g. dosage control caps on any bottle is an innovation while new bottle shape is a renovation. 

Now the question on when should one innovate - basically what are the checks one must have in place before embarking on the journey of innovation. Even if competition is out innovating you; first look inside - assess the following and then look at innovation as your growth engine. 

Assumption: there is a large enough base business for the brand & you are looking at innovation to drive incremental growth. 

1. Health of your base business: if there is any trouble in that paradise - drop everything and see what can turn it around. Unless the conclusion is that the base business category/your product offering in that caregory is doomed and the only way to grow is to quickly build other pillars. 

2. Weigh your moneybags: here two things need to be checked. Firstly, is your base business sufficiently funded for the time period you are looking at. And secondly, assessing how much money will it take to make your innovation a success (according to your own KPIs) and whether you can afford it because there is some money you have to burn before the awareness to trial ratios start kicking in & create a snowball effect. You need to have the burn money before you innovate

3. Aukat: this again is twofold. Firstly, the brand’s/company’s ability to distribute the innovation. Indian retail space reality is very simple “jab hoga to bikega” - no consumer will go hunting for your innovation shop to shop - unless you can make yourself available in category weighted outlets it is impossible for you to succeed. Secondly, do you have the courage, money & will to sustain innovations - because innovations need nurturing. Its like having a baby - its very different from a dog who starts being your companion from day 1. Babies need to be nurtured till they are 2 or 3 and can talk and play with you. (Am not saying dogs don't need to be nurtured but they do give ROI on nurturing faster).

If you have all three - then be a good marketer and design an innovation (whether incremental or disruptive) that will step change your growth curve. 

As I said, these are my opinions and happy to answer any questions or debate any point. 



Hopefully I shall go back to once a month routine. Till then happy selling :) 

Saturday, June 2, 2018

Books that have shaped my school of marketing

Hello people. I am trying to keep my promise of doing at least 1 post in a month although I am super delayed on this one. Let me try and be punctual and deliver on promised timelines in the future. The genesis of this post is a conversation I had last week at the lunch table with some colleagues who were trashing Kotler and saying how it was a waste of time & how it didn't help them to learn anything at all that has aided them in delivering on their jobs. I of course disagreed because I personally am a big fan of Kotler. I know a lot of you will be scoffing right now and may not read the rest of the post at all because of this. But honestly, step back once and think - did Kotler not make all of us know 4Ps of marketing inside out. We all have evolved our thinking on the 4Ps and in fact have moved into more evolved models of 5Ps and 7Cs and all of that. But the first time we all understood what does marketing mean is through Kotler and often enough we all resort to jargon from that book only. So yes, I am a big Kotler fan. But then I came across the below listed books - some recommended by people I respect in the field & some just because I happened to read them. So hopefully, you will find the list useful and will read some (if not all) of them. Since it is my blog I can set the rules and hence my only rule if you pick up any of the books to read is to read them fully and not the synopsis. The beauty of the books resides in the details & the examples & sometimes just the way some expressions are used to say the most obvious & mundane things making your eyes go wide.

1. How Brands Grow: What Marketers Don't Know by Byron Sharp: famously known as the red book of marketing has to at some point of time become your marketing bible. And while writing this I realised that the red book may not refer to just the cover of the book but also the analogy to the field of astrology in India followed by the 'laal kitaab"  - coincidence? Maybe! So How Brands Grow..... the book has 2 simple rules which it goes to explain through the pages (I am para phrasing here of course) - make your brand more available on the shelf & in people's minds. Brands grow only and only when you manage to do these two things. The book also kicks up a big controversy about sharply defined target audience, creating value through niches and how all of it is a misnomer. The biggest myth this book aims at breaking is about brand distinction & is it more important to create emotional connect with the consumer of create consistent memory structures which make the brand distinctive in the consumers mind. All of this may seem outrageous for those who have not read the book but trust me once you read the book, run the numbers on your own brands it is an eye opening exercise. Byron Sharp & his institute have dedicated themselves to proving their theories with actual numbers and those are water tight. In the long run, brands that run behind penetration and at wide audience win.

2. Practice of Marketing; Science or Superstition by Shyamal Ghose: this is one of those nondescript books that most people have not heard about and few have read. Or rather I should say in my limited sample set of people I discuss marketing books with; its not a known book and hence I am very glad that I chanced upon it. The story behind this is actually funny. I was supposed to attend a strategy training by Shyamal Ghosh so I read up on him and then bought the book so that I at least know what is school of thought in marketing is - the nerd that I used to be! On hindsight, I am glad I bought it and read it. His book outlines how marketing will win when it becomes an exact science and he describes it using models. He details the scientific models of looking at data in the most simplistic language making people like me who inherently were not data savvy grasp the concept easily. This book I think should definitely be read by all newly minted brand managers just to be able to envisage all marketing models that can help you decipher your brands better

3. The End of Advertising as We Know It by Sergio Zyman: I have to admit that this book is a bit outdated now as the advertising and media world have changed substantially since I read this book. But if one wants to understand when to use which media and what should the messaging be like then this is a good book to turn towards. I would still recommend this book in the new age world of digital media to really just get the basics right. It also of course appeals to my firm right brain belief in the power of advertising - it needs to sell and the art and everything fuzzy about it as just by products.

4. Culture Code by Clotaire Rapaille: if you want to understand how human brains work and what drives them then this is the book to turn to. It is not essentially a marketing focussed book per se. In fact, I came across this when I was reading on the concept of nostalgence related to fragrances. The fragrance expert on my brand brought up this book and talked about the reptile brain. The concept fascinated me and then I read the book. I think it is one of the better written books on consumer motivations and how they emanate from fundamental belief systems and memory structures - language, history & most importantly culture that one grows up in. Intuitively it seems consumer behaviour 101 but the way the brain is described and then different cultural symbols that can be used to appeal to the Culture Codes. One of my all time favourites.

5. Nudge by Casss Sunstein & Richard Thaler: This one definitely is not a marketing book. In fact it is one of the better books written on behavioural economics and this work truly nudged Thaler towards his Nobel Prize. Why I recommend Nudge for marketing is because I think if one wants to understand & in turn impact behaviour change for their TG then this is the book to read. It uses examples of healthcare, anti smoking campaigns and what makes people change their behaviour. It outlines how people make choices and at what points in the process can you impact it. What part of the brain should these interventions appeal to for being impactful and eventually how to make it into a habit. Lately, I have found more answers in this book than others that I have read over the years. It is also one of those books I have read over & again to design my concepts & campaigns.

These are just a few of my favourite ones and in no way an exhaustive list. There are loads more to read and eventually to design your own school of thought in marketing. Marketing irrespective of how scientific it gets & how much analytics can lead to decisions; is a gut feel and only when you have educated yourself enough can you develop one of your own. I have diligently invested in reading, understanding, debating, discarding & eventually imbibing what makes sense to me. Hoping that whoever reads these books can fall in love with them as I did. 

Tuesday, April 10, 2018

Making Ads Part 3 - AD (After development)

I have been meaning to write this for a while now but then life took over & then this took a backseat. I needed a break from my craft as I have fondly started calling marketing. Well, this is the closest I will be able to call myself creative. So, I decided to take refuge in my second favourite passion - travel!!! This post comes to you from Japan. I am currently at this moment on my way from Osaka to Hiroshima - from modernity to history is what I am choosing to call this journey. It is also the sort of contrast I enjoy in storytelling & advertising. 

Till now on our journey of making ads we have covered the science behind making ads & how to nail a brief. From the release of the brief till you actually decide on the script & then shoot it there is a long period. I call it the dramatic pause. How all performing arts have this moment when you wait with your breath held for something big & dramatic to happen. This is the time the creative team is taking to come up with the brilliant script that will overwhelm you. 

This post is about how to marry whatever we have done in part 1 & part 2 with the actual creative work for bringing out at ad/campaign that works. Now first thing to be convinced about individually and sadly no one will be able to change your mind if you believe otherwise is that advertising’s sole purpose is to sell. It will sell better if its memorable & can break clutter but its purpose is still to sell. Its purpose is not to entertain or win awards. Well if awards is the purpose then the brief should be different and yes maybe once in a lifetime you will hit the jackpot and make advertising that will do both. I have not seen many & hence I will focus on what is the usual order - ads need to increase sales. Of course the route to more sales is better brand recall, better brand association, better brand love & eventually building propensity for trail. 

So where do we start with this part of ad making - After Development (AD). Ensure that the script/campaign is presented by the creative themselves in a meeting. Please do not get scripts or creatives emailed to you. So much is lost in translation when you read something on your own. The tone & the visualisatio  is completely lost when seen on a computer screen. Its like reading a book & making your own assumptions about what is the character like till someone else actually tells them your POV. This part of the process is also where your right brain needs to take over your left brain. You need to become a consumer. As Dumbledore tells Harry in the 6th book - from now on we will leave the known & venture into guesswork. Appreciating a script is pretty much like that. For every brief written millions of scripts can be written and you will never be able to tell which is better even on hindsight because you will choose only one and move forward. 

I will however try & outline some of the things that can help you make a better choice - its not fool proof but then most things in marketing are not. Unlike potion making that is exact; marketing is a field of magic that needs individuality & judgement (apologies to the non Harry Potter fans - I can’t help but draw analogies from there - I promise the post still makes complete sense. It may lack the fun for you :p)

1. Put yourself in the TGs shoes: evaluate the script/campaign as your TG will. You should know your TG inside out and when you hear he script/campaign think about what she/he will think about it. This is often easier said than done. This is where pop culture & mass entertainment comes to our rescue. Look around yourself for trends that the consumer is responding positively to & then see if your script/campaign comfirms to it. Here, be a little cautious. While it needs to confirm to the mass trends - it cannot sit in the center of it. It needs to sit just a tiny bit outside of it to be perceived as interesting & new. Eventually leading to breaking clutter. Example if you are showing a conventional husband wife relationship; it cannot depict a submissive - you are my lord wife. There needs to be a new age bend to it. 

2. Remember the brief: even if the script blows your mind; if it does not deliver to the brief - do not proceed. Ask the creative team the question - how does it deliver to the brief? We are all guilty of choosing the story over the logic & in a few & rare cases the punt also pays off. But more often than not, one winds up with a piece of creative that is great; overwhelmingly good but does little to do what it was supposed to - increase sales. 

3. Confirmity to brand codes: the script needs to sit within the brand world you have curated & carefully nurtured over years of existence. For a new brand this would be the world you need to weave & be clear about before you look at the creative. The brand world determines the creative language & not vice versa. Example if you are a brand based on the vibrancy of youth & everything it brings with itself - college life, need for new experiences, need for edginess all leading to a bit of flippancy or volatility 
(E.g. Fast Track); talking about changing the world & youth is the power of tomorrow (E.g. Tata Tea) is not being true to your brand world and even if its the trend & is being adopted across categories & pop culture - do not accept it. 

4. Brand is a part of the story: This is where you & your creative team will differ the most. But this is where you come in as the custodian of the brand. Your brand needs to be a part of the story. The ad should not be complete without the role your brand has to play in it. For example in the Asian Paints (har ghar kuch kehta hai) ad; the story is not complete without Asian Paints at all. Your brand needs to be the phoenix feather wand in Harry Potter - the story is not complete without it. A large part of this is aided by your brief & the brand world you create but the rest is the job of the creative. And yes sometimes your brand uniquely may not fit into the story but at least the category needs to. In large, highly penetrated categories with multiple brands straddling the same benefit segment to have the brand uniquely play a role in the story is unrealistic. But yes the category & most importantly the benefit segment definitely needs to. For example fresh breath needs to be integral to a toothpaste ad even if its not Close up. 

5. Let your heart respond: once you have done the first four its time to let the right brain take over. If the script/campaign does not speak to your heart then its not the right script. It needs to appeal to you as a creative piece of work much like a book or a movie or a song or a video or a TV show. And it doesn’t need to be just emotional - it needs to just be something that instinctively appeals to your right brain - could be emotional, funny, nostalgic, dramatic, shocking et al

With this I finish my discourse on ad making. There is a whole lot to be done as you move from here to actual production & releasing it. That part mostly is the operational bit of ad making. I personally love it - Pre-bids, treatment notes, PPMs, offlines et al. But I am not sure if anyone is interested enough to want to go through 
that process in detail. If there are people who want to know, leave a comment and if there is a quorum; we shall take you through that process as well. 

P.s. Apologies for typos if any - its been written on the phone in small print on a train. So please excuse. 


Sunday, April 1, 2018

Designing Pack Price Architecture (PPA) through Conjoint


Part 3/3 from Jayant - insightful piece on Price Pack Architecture to optimise portfolios. From whatever I've seen, this is one of the most effective parts of the Revenue Growth toolkit.

Designing Pack Price Architecture (PPA) through Conjoint

Most consumer decisions are made within the influence of several factors – price, competitive marketing efforts (media and trade promotions), brand significance, share of mind/shelf in the shop/retail, new innovative launches etc. So how can a researcher decide on a methodology that allows us to study the impact of these variables when optimizing a brand portfolio.
Price Pack Architecture is important to ensure that each SKU in a brand portfolio is aiding in maximizing volume and value for the parent brand (with least cannibalization). Since each SKU would differ slightly in its offering (size, price, flavor etc.), it needs to be understood what impact does it have on the business by changing or introducing new SKUs or brands in the portfolio.
Conjoint is one of the most commonly used research tools to study the impact of different PPA scenarios, e.g.
·       what would happen if we change the size (grams) of one of our SKUs?
·       Does a 10-cookie pack cannibalize my own 5 cookie pack or take from competition?
·       Does reducing price by $1 hep increase volumes enough to bring more revenue?

How it works?
Collecting data – The exercise is simple – each respondent is shown a series of scenarios with different brands and SKUs at different price points. These SKUs and price points vary for each scenario. We may show some brands and SKUs in some screen and not show in another. The same SKU can have a variation of price points (generally defined as +10% or +5% of base price).
Then for each scenario the respondent is asked to choose an option they would most likely buy (assuming this were a real purchase). To make the scenario true to reality we sometimes also offer an option of “none/buy something else” to allow the respondent an option to reject all options in a scenario. Below is a screen to illustrate a survey screen. Generally, a respondent is exposed to 10-15 such screens depending on the number of brands/SKUs we are testing.


Interpreting the output –



        Price sensitivity analysis is done to determine Optimal price points: Below is an example of a price sensitivity analysis – it shows that if everything in the market were to remain constant, how would our brands value and volume sales change if we alter the price. The slope of this curve is called price elasticity (i.e. the change in value/volume sales if we change the price by 1 unit). Brand managers desire to have price in-elastic products (i.e. very small price elasticity ~0). A low-price elasticity would indicate that the brand doesn’t lose sales as we increase price.



The price range to play in would be the region between two break points i.e. the points where there is a biggest drop in sales when price is changed



        Forecasting volumes in different scenarios – we can create scenarios and predict the volume/value sales changes. E.g. look at the example below –
        The portfolio mix with an addition of small pack (4 cookie) in Choco Crème leads to an overall 6% and 4% growth in volume and revenue respectively of the portfolio
        However, this portfolio mix leads to 7% decrease in both volume and revenue respectively for the Vanilla variants





Running different permutation and combination of such scenarios will then help estimate gain/loss to portfolio, thus deciding an optimal portfolio. We can also create scenarios where the competition prices and launches can be presumed to predict different “what if” scenarios.

KPIs for Brand Health Tracker: Reading BHT Metrics


Here's part 2/3 from Jayant - some basics in tracking your brands health

KPIs for Brand Health Tracker: Reading BHT Metrics

As a marketer tracking sales helps understand your market standing. But it doesn’t answer ‘why” your sales are the way they are. You may enjoy a large share but an undesirable brand strength or vice versa. Hence it is important to measure the health and equity of a brand in the market.

Brand health trackers are the mostly used “research tool” to track (hence the name tracker) and measure the standing of brand and its competitors in the market. It is a standard report that is generated on a consistent frequency. This frequency may vary from industry to industry (e.g. it’s important for CPG brands to measure key brand health metrics on monthly or even weekly basis).
Each such iteration is generally called a wave, so you read movements of key brand health metrics wave on wave. E.g. If we do brand health tracking twice a year, then you have two waves a year. 
Generally, in practice you wish to see movements of data for last 2 to 4 waves depending how far back in history to you wish to go.
In this short write up we will go through some of these key brand health metrics and analysis, which you should know as a brand manager –

Brand Funnels: As shown below, this funnels helps us understand how good the brand is doing at all aspects of customer decision making process. E.g. below graph shows us that our brand is performing poorly on translating consideration to trial and making sure we are the Most Often Used Brand (MOUB). Other brands are performing better at these aspects.
·       Awareness – The union of unaided and aided recall gives us ‘awareness’. Being low on this indicated that the brand needs to increase share of voice in the media/communications – more campaigns and communications to help improve the awareness of the brand
o   We ask “which brands are you aware of”, followed by an open-end text box. %age of respondents mentioning the brand gives us “unaided recall” of the brand
o   After which we can show a list of brands and ask “which ones of these brands are you aware of”, %age of respondents mentioning the brand gives us “aided recall” of the brand
·       Consideration – Within the brands that the respondent is aware of, it is the percentage of respondents who say they have considered purchasing/using the brand in the past Being low on this indicates our positioning or offering isn’t right i.e. consumers do not think of us as a valid choice to fulfill their needs
·       Trial – Within the brands that the respondent has considered, it is the percentage of respondents who say they have purchased/used the brand in the past Low on this generally indicates that our availability or price is an issue. Because what is
·       Usage – Within the brands that the respondent has tried, it is the percentage of respondents who say they are currently using the brand (in case of categories like confectionary, services like restaurant, hotels etc. we ask if they have used it in recently e.g. last 1 week/month etc.)
·       Most often used brand (MOUB or BUMO, Brand used most often) – Within the brands that the respondent is currently using, it is the percentage of respondents who say that the brand is their most often used brand.
Very important: For consideration, trial, usage and MOUB we generally ask respondents to not think beyond 3 months for CPG brands and up to a year for high involvement categories like cars, appliances, hotels, vacations etc.

Share of Heart/ Share of Mind: The Share of our brand versus other brands in the unaided awareness is sometimes termed as “share of mind”. Similarly, the share of our brand versus other brands for MOUB is often referred to as “share of heart”.
Likelihood to used again – Sometime, post the funnel questions, we ask respondent how likely are they to continue using their MOUB. This metric is asked on a 5/7 or 10-point scale. The percentage of respondent answering the top score or top 2 scores are reported as the loyalty metric.  
NPS – In the service sector (e.g. hospitality, telecom, software etc.) there is standard metric used called Net Promoter Score (NPS). Respondents are asked how likely are they to recommend a brand. This is asked for our and competitor brand on a 11-point scale (0 to 10). Percentage of respondents giving top 3 ratings are called promoters and bottom and bottom 6 ratings (0 to 5) are called detractors. Promoters % minus detractor % gives us the NPS score. There are other ways to calculate this and it is a topic that warrants a detailed discussion. So, till then we will pause here.
Brand Imagery: This is the second most important part of a brand health tracker. For each brand that the respondent is aware of OR have used in the past, we ask to rate the brands on different attributes.

Attribute List: Below are some examples of attributes that a brand can track –
This brand's products taste great
This brand Helps me be independent
This brand has packaging I like
This brand helps me to keep doing the things I love
This brand comes in Flavors I Like
This is a brand I trust
This brand is widely available
This brand’s products offer good value for money
This brand is Easy to find in the store
This brand’s products are of high quality
I enjoy watching the ads from this brand
This brand brings new and innovative products
This is a brand I love
Is a premium brand
This Is a brand I want to be seen using
Is an inspiring brand
This Is a popular brand
The brand is a leader in the market
This brand's products have a texture I like
This brand's products are different from other brands
Is on sale often
This brand is recommended by my friends and family

Some themes of attributes are –

Functional Benefits (price, value, ease of use etc,)
Brand positioning (emotional in nature e.g. trust, brand for me, scientific, cool, modern etc.)
Category Leadership
Recommendations/ Endorsements (reco by friend, reco by expert, reco by salesperson)
Packaging
Product
Products 
Retail Availability
Advertising


Owned versus Opportunities: When comparing the brands across different attributes, you will notice attributes which our brand is the strongest versus competitive brands. These are ‘owned’ attributes, some attributes may be owned by competition as well. There is also a low hanging fruit – attributes which are not owned by any brand – i.e. all brands have a low rating on these attributes. These low hanging fruits and competition owned attributes are the opportunities for our brand to act on.
Ad/Message Recall: Sometimes brands wish to measure Ad recall along with brand health tracker. The most common ad recall metric is –  Rate of Recall: Percentage of respondents who mentioned they recall seeing an ad by the brand. This again can be asked as aided and unaided, just like the awareness metric. We also follow up this question by asking where do they recall seeing the ad – TV, print, POS, radio etc.
Purchase/Usage behavior: Brand health trackers also allow opportunity to ask behavioral and usage data. This is done especially for categories with growing distribution in the markets. Asking respondents where (point of purchase), when (how frequently) and how much (quantity) of product do they purchase.
Some Guidance tips:
·       Target population: This is important, because it will decide ‘who” will answer your brand health tracker questionnaire. Going beyond your target population will give us bad or useless data. e.g. the target for Horlicks would be Moms of kids aged 2 to 10 year old kids, from socio economic class A. B and C. these moms should be using or willing to use nutritional supplements for their kids.
·       Rolling data Versus Stand in Time: We measure brand health metrics either per wave, or we combine data for past waves to reduce any sample bias i.e. sudden jumps and movements (this is called rolling data e.g. past 3 waves rolled as one reading)
·       Brand Power: many research providers have their own trademark methodologies to give one single score brand equity score/measure.
·       Social Media: This is one aspect that warrants a special discussion. Generally, the social media indicators are ahead of its time than overall market, as early adopters are the first ones to talk about the brand or product online versus others. Also, social media analysis complements a tracker, it is still far away from replacing the traditional brand health tracker.


Being smart about research

A key area to nail to succeed as a marketer is research - it forms the basis of the decisions that you take. There are several areas to be explored in MR, so as a starter I requested Jayant to help clarify some  basic MR concepts, and introduce a few key frameworks (in the following posts).

I know Jayant from MICA, and he's spent the better part of this decade working in research, helping consumer clients form better decisions from their data at AbsolutData in Chicago. You can find him here.

Here's the first of three parts: Being smart about research:


Most marketers would have support from their Insights and Analytics team. These teams could work parallel feeding strategic insights at regular intervals or at times respond to Adhoc requests from marketing teams. In majority of the organizations insights and analytics team is an integral part of the marketing team itself, working closely on a day-to-day basis. A successful marketer would always be a smart researcher as well. This does not imply to have deep knowledge of techniques and methodologies but a quick understanding of three aspects –

1.       Explaining a Brief: How do I frame my question to get the best answer?

For illustration purposes, let’s us say the question is “Locate the positioning of a new brand line extension in the market for brand X”. This statement can be further dissected into three questions:
·       Current Brand Saliency: What does brand X stand for? My extension can’t be too far away from it?
·       White Spaces: What are some white spaces around brand X that this new line extension will target?
·       Immediate Line Extension Positioning Opportunities: How can I prioritize these different white spaces for my new line extension?

Now see below how these questions are translated into simple requests for the research brief
Jargon – What you speak?
Plain Spoken – what you actually need?
What you do research wise?
Current Brand Saliency
What is the perception of brand X in the market?
See on which brand attributes does brand X lead against competition
White Spaces
Which attributes are currently not owned by any brand?
 Identify attributes not owned by any brand (i.e. all brands have 50% or lower association)
Immediate Line Extension Positioning Opportunities
What is the perception of brand X on the “white spaces”
Locate which attributes the line extension can position itself on

2.       Suggesting methodologies: What scale/scope of research do I need?

We will cover these topics in details one by one in later posts. Here is quick cheat sheet of different methodologies for the key business questions you may be thinking about

Pricing
Existing SKUs/ Brands
Nielsen data: Look at the Average Selling price versus competition
Market mix Modelling: See the impact of price changes: Price sensitivity graphs
Price Pack Architecture: Price sensitivity graphs
A/B Testing (this is mostly in Ecommerce domain)
New Product
Price Sensitivity Monitor
Gabor Grangers method
Conjoint (Optimization)
Profit Pool Analysis
Product/
Portfolio
Logo/ Design
Qualitative: Concept/Copy Testing
Quantitative: Concept/Copy Testing
Features/ Attributes
Usage and Attitude Study (also called A&U, U&A etc.)
Habits and Practices Study (e.g. diary based, sometime through panels etc.)
Trade Off Exercise: Conjoint (Optimization)
Promotions/ Campaigns
New campaign
Qualitative: Concept/Copy Testing
A/B Testing (this is mostly in Ecommerce domain)
Conjoint (Optimization)
Existing campaign
Market Mix Modelling
Ad tracking
LINK test (there are several such trademark studies available through traditional research providers)
Lift Calculation (Mostly in the tech/digital and E-Commerce domain)
Medium/ Platform (TV, Digital, OOH etc.)
Market Mix Modelling
Attribution Modelling (Mostly in the tech/digital and E-Commerce domain)
Place/ Medium
Traditional Channels
Channel Optimization
Market Mix Modelling
Nielsen Dashboards: Nielsen data can provide time series growth and distribution metrics
E-Commerce
Attribution Modelling (Mostly in the tech/digital and E-Commerce domain)

You will notice that segmentation isn’t mentioned here – because it’s an expensive and elaborate exercise to do. You don’t sound smart by suggesting segmentation as a first solution to a business problem. Any brand manager would have access to the profiles of key segments in the market. A good segmentation is valid for 2-4 years depending how mature the market is. The more mature/stable the market, the longer segmentation is valid (e.g. US/Europe are mature markets versus Vietnam/India which are emerging markets).

3.       Reading data: Know how to read data?

Reading data across different types of consumers is called ‘Cuts’ or ‘Banners’. Some key cuts that you should always keep in mind are as follows –
TOTAL
Key Consumer Segments
Brand Users
Demographics
All Respondents
Seg A
Seg B
Seg C
Own Brand
Comp 1
Age, gender, ethnicity, region, etc.
New Users
Loyal Users
Lapsers











A.      Total number is generally misleading, e.g.
·       There are consumers aged 18-20 yr and then there are some older ones at 50-55 yr
·       The average age would be 30 yr
·       In reality – there isn’t any consumer aged 30, so reading averages is dangerous
B.       Be careful in reading demographic data. E.g. Reading across ethnicity is pretty common in US, while it is unethical in EU
C.       Reading across consumer segments is important, as brands take decisions by keeping in mind only the “Key Strategic Segment”, remember – you can’t target all